Middle East Blog
By Anastasia Kuzmenko
Mark your calendars! Don't miss out on this exciting GTW, which builds on the success of the first Carbonate Reservoirs of the Middle East GTW held in Abu Dhabi, UAE in 2015..
American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)
Added on 03 April, 2017
Explorer Historical Highlights
By Richard Bain
A few months after the founding of AAPG in early 1917, the first description of the Wolfcamp Formation was published in the University of Texas Bulletin No. 1753 titled “Notes on the Geology of the Glass Mountains” by J. A. Udden, on Sept. 20, 1917.
American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)
Added on 01 April, 2017
Explorer Emphasis Article
By David Brown
The Next 100 Years: Data management is a crucial component of oil exploration. What does the century ahead look like for Big Data in the oil field?
American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)
Added on 01 April, 2017
Middle East Blog
By Anastasia Kuzmenko
The GEO 2018 committee welcomes your abstracts for oral and poster presentations at the 13th Middle Geosciences Conference and Exhibition (GEO 2018) which will take place from 5 — 8 March in Bahrain. Submit today and join the largest gathering of geoscience professionals in the Middle East.
American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)
Added on 16 March, 2017
Explorer Emphasis Article
By Ken Milam
Last year, the extraordinarily high quality of the technical program was the talk of the AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition in Calgary, and this was at an ACE with plenty of high points to talk about. The technical program for the 2017 ACE in Houston promises to be even better than last year’s.
American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)
Added on 01 March, 2017
Search and Discovery Article
By Cat Campbell,Mark H. Tobey
Rock-Eval hydrogen index (HI) is often used to compare relative maturities of a source horizon across a basin. Usually, there are
several
measurements from the source horizon at a single well, and the mean
hydrogen index is calculated, or the S2 is plotted against TOC. The slope
of the best fit line through that data is used as the representative HI for that well (sometimes referred to as the ‘slope HI
’ methodology). There
is a potential flaw in both these
methodologies; however, that renders the calculated HI as misleading if the source horizon being examined is
not relatively uniform in source quality, vertically in the stratigraphic column. From a geologic perspective, it would be unusual for the source
rock quality not to vary vertically in the stratigraphic column. Organic matter input, preservation, dilution, and sediment accumulation rate
typically vary in many depositional environments over the millions of years required to create a thick source rock
package. Nevertheless, there
are source rocks which do display remarkable source-quality uniformity from top to bottom of the stratigraphic package. We have examined
source rocks from several basins where the source quality is relatively uniform over the stratigraphic column, and source rocks where the
source quality varies greatly over the stratigraphic column. Methodologies to assess hydrogen index at specific wells for the
se two scenarios
differ. Most geoscientists may not be familiar with why a single technique is not suitable for both these scenarios, or how to correctly use
hydrogen index as a relative maturation proxy in the case where source rock quality is not uniform. We will demonstrate how to determine if
your source rock quality is uniform or varied relative to HI over the stratigraphic column, and how to assign a hydrogen index to the different
source facies when that source rock quality is not uniform. Further we will illustrate how to estimate the original hydrogen
index of the
different source facies and assign each a transformation ratio. The transformation ratio is a better proxy for relative maturity, since different
source facies may have different present-day hydrogen indices, but their present-day transformation ratio should be quite similar.
Show more
American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)
Added on 17 February, 2017
Search and Discovery Article
By Larry Meckel,Stephen A. Sonnenberg
The driving forces for conventional accumulations (structural or stratigraphic traps) are Forces of Buoyancy which are due to
differences in
densities of hydrocarbons and water. In contrast, the driving forces for unconventional tight accumulations are Forces of Expulsion which are
produced by high pressures. That is an enormous difference and creates unconventional petroleum systems that are characterized by very
different and distinctive characteristics. The Force of Expulsion pressures are created by the
significant increase in volume when any of the
three main kerogen types are converted to hydrocarbons. At those conversion times in the burial history, the rocks are already sufficiently tight
so the large volumes of generated hydrocarbons cannot efficiently escape through the existing tight pore system,
thus creating a permeability
bottleneck that produces an overpressured compartment over a large area corresponding to the proper thermal oil and gas maturities for that
basin. The forces initially created
in these source rocks can only go limited distances into adjacent tight reservoirs (clastics or carbonates)
above or below the source. The exact distance will vary depending on the pressure increase, matrix permeability, and fractures of that specific
tight reservoir system. In general, the distances are small, in the orders of 10s to 100s of feet for oil and larger for more mobile gas systems.
Those exact distance numbers are subject to ongoing investigations.
A plot of the pressure data versus elevation
for a given formation is critical in determining whether an accumulation is conventional or
unconventional. Conventional accumulations will have hydrocarbon columns of 10s to 100s of feet with the pressure in the hydrocarbons and
that in the water equal at the bottom of the accumulation (at the HC-water contact). In contrast, the unconventional accumulations will show
HC column heights of 1000s of feet with the pressure in the hydrocarbon phase and the water phase being the same at the top of the
accumulation (at the updip transition zone). Those significant differences are critical for understanding and differentiating these two play types.
Because the system is a pore throat bottleneck with very little or minimum lateral migration, the type of hydrocarbon
s are closely tied to the
thermal maturity required to generate those hydrocarbons. Thus the play concept begins with two important geochemical considerations: (1)
where are the source rocks and what are the kerogen types and organic richness (TOC), and (2
) where are they mature in the basin for oil,
condensate, and gas in the basin. These parameters will very quickly define the fairway for the play. Then one has to add the
critical
information on the reservoirs themselves: composition (brittleness), thickness, and reservoir quality (matrix porosity and permeability). In
summary, these tight unconventional petroleum systems (1) are dynamic
,
and (2) create a regionally inverted petroleum system with water over
oil over condensate over gas for source rocks wit
h Type I or II kerogen types.
Show more
American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)
Added on 17 February, 2017
Explorer Article
The AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition will feature a variety of field trips that will bookend the meeting, spanning from March 26 to April 8.
American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)
Added on 01 February, 2017
Explorer Emphasis Article
By David Brown
The eastern Mediterranean Sea could become the hottest offshore play in the Middle East area, depending on the outcome of a key exploration attempt later this year.
American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)
Added on 01 February, 2017