Conflict in Fault Terminology: Vertical Separation Versus Throw

Professional Development

December 2007 By Daniel J. Tearpock

Probably no portion of geologic literature has a more confused terminology than that dealing with faults." This is a profound statement that is as applicable today as it was when made by H.W. Straley in 1932. A literature search on the subject of fault nomenclature, or terminology, shows that as far back as the turn of the last century, there was great inconsistency in the use of fault component terminology.

We're sorry. This article is available only to DPA members. To continue reading, please login or consider joining the DPA to gain access.

Conflict in Fault Terminology: Vertical Separation Versus Throw

Professional Development

December 2007 By Daniel J. Tearpock

Probably no portion of geologic literature has a more confused terminology than that dealing with faults." This is a profound statement that is as applicable today as it was when made by H.W. Straley in 1932. A literature search on the subject of fault nomenclature, or terminology, shows that as far back as the turn of the last century, there was great inconsistency in the use of fault component terminology.

We're sorry. This article is available only to DPA members. To continue reading, please login or consider joining the DPA to gain access.

What Can I Do?

Conflict in Fault Terminology: Vertical Separation Versus Throw

Professional Development

December 2007 By Daniel J. Tearpock

Probably no portion of geologic literature has a more confused terminology than that dealing with faults." This is a profound statement that is as applicable today as it was when made by H.W. Straley in 1932. A literature search on the subject of fault nomenclature, or terminology, shows that as far back as the turn of the last century, there was great inconsistency in the use of fault component terminology.

We're sorry. This article is available only to DPA members. To continue reading, please login or consider joining the DPA to gain access.

Conflict in Fault Terminology: Vertical Separation Versus Throw

Professional Development

December 2007 By Daniel J. Tearpock

Probably no portion of geologic literature has a more confused terminology than that dealing with faults." This is a profound statement that is as applicable today as it was when made by H.W. Straley in 1932. A literature search on the subject of fault nomenclature, or terminology, shows that as far back as the turn of the last century, there was great inconsistency in the use of fault component terminology.

We're sorry. This article is available only to DPA members. To continue reading, please login or consider joining the DPA to gain access.

Conflict in Fault Terminology: Vertical Separation Versus Throw

Professional Development

December 2007 By Daniel J. Tearpock

Probably no portion of geologic literature has a more confused terminology than that dealing with faults." This is a profound statement that is as applicable today as it was when made by H.W. Straley in 1932. A literature search on the subject of fault nomenclature, or terminology, shows that as far back as the turn of the last century, there was great inconsistency in the use of fault component terminology.

We're sorry. This article is available only to DPA members. To continue reading, please login or consider joining the DPA to gain access.

Conflict in Fault Terminology: Vertical Separation Versus Throw

Professional Development

December 2007 By Daniel J. Tearpock

Probably no portion of geologic literature has a more confused terminology than that dealing with faults." This is a profound statement that is as applicable today as it was when made by H.W. Straley in 1932. A literature search on the subject of fault nomenclature, or terminology, shows that as far back as the turn of the last century, there was great inconsistency in the use of fault component terminology.

We're sorry. This article is available only to DPA members. To continue reading, please login or consider joining the DPA to gain access.